![]() This is the nature of working with others. Though it's safe to just git fetch periodically.Īnd to ensure your feature branch remains up to date with the latest changes, you will have to periodically update your branch from release/1.0. This is the decentralized nature of Git, it does not assume you have a connection to your remotes. Git checkout -b feature/123 origin/release/1.0 Note that you still have to git fetch the remote to ensure you have the latest version. Simple - pushes the current branch with the same name on the remote. You probably want simple which is the default. When you run git push it has to guess where to push your branch to. $ git checkout -no-track -b feature/123 origin/release/1.0Īnd you can change the behavior globally with toSetupMerge. $ git checkout -b feature/123 origin/release/1.0īranch 'feature/123' set up to track remote branch 'release/1.0' from 'origin'. Name this remote teamone, which will be your shortname for that whole URL. This is the remote branch it will use when pushing and pulling. You can add it as a new remote reference to the project you’re currently working on by running the git remote add command as we covered in Git Basics. When you branch from a remote branch, Git automatically sets up the remote as the "tracking branch". $ git push -set-upstream origin feature/123 $ git checkout -b feature/123 origin/release/1.0 ![]() Update global git config git config -global toSetupMerge falseĬreate new branch from latest release $ git fetch -all Is there a way to do this, or do we have to just keep pulling in the latest release and then branching from there locally? Solution I have to do that quite a bit though and it feels like I should be able to skip having to pull in the release/1.0 branch locally, and instead, create my branch with one command. git checkout -b feature/123 origin/release/1.0Ĭurrently, the workflow that works is: git checkout release/1.0 I've tried the following, but when I push, it pushes to the incorrect (origin/release/1.0) branch instead of pushing to a new branch (feature/123) on GitHub. It seems like there should be a way to do this. I've been discussing with my team and searching the internet, but I cannot figure out how to create a new git branch locally based on a remote branch hosted on GitHub.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |